How to Scope and Budget a Communications Audit for Alberta Capital Projects

communications audit

Build Stronger Project Outcomes with a Strategic Audit

A communications audit is not a soft add-on for Alberta capital projects. It is a hard tool for reducing risk, protecting budgets, and building trust with the people who can speed up or slow down your work. When projects hit delays, it is often because someone did not understand what was happening, did not feel heard, or saw a surprise that should not have been a surprise.

For transportation, utilities, health, education, industrial, and municipal projects, a well-scoped audit shows what is working, what is not, and where messages are missing the mark. It helps you see where confusion, gaps, or silence are creating friction with communities, Indigenous partners, regulators, and your own internal teams.

Why and When You Need a Communications Audit

On capital projects, there are clear moments when a communications audit pays off. Common triggers include:

  • Early planning for new builds or major renewals  

  • Shifts between project phases, like design to construction or construction to operations  

  • Growing controversy or complaints around noise, access, safety, or environment  

  • New regulatory expectations or permit conditions  

  • Changes in leadership or project ownership  

It also helps to be clear on the difference between a casual review and a formal audit. A review might check a few channels and make light suggestions. A formal audit adds rigour by applying structured analysis, testing, and governance review so you can link communications performance to real project risk and outcomes. A formal audit typically includes:

  • Stakeholder mapping across communities, Indigenous partners, industry, and government  

  • Channel performance analysis, including digital, print, meetings, and hotlines  

  • Message testing to see what people hear, not just what you send  

  • Process and governance review across project, corporate, and contractor teams  

  • Alignment with project outcomes, permits, and commitments  

Timing changes what you ask for and how much effort is needed. A strategy audit is often broader and more forward-looking. A mid-project course correction needs quicker field work, clearer issue diagnosis, and tight turnaround so you can adjust before a construction milestone or council decision. Post-project audits lean into lessons learned and future standards.

In Alberta, you also need to think about winter construction seasons, municipal budget cycles, and the provincial fiscal year. If your construction window is short because of frost, you want audit findings in hand before shovels go in the ground, not halfway through.


Defining Scope for Capital Project Communications Audits

Scope is where many audits succeed or fail. Too narrow and you miss key risks. Too broad and the work drags out and loses focus. For an Alberta capital project, core scope often includes:

  • Project context review, including history, permits, and political sensitivity  

  • Stakeholder landscape, such as residents, Indigenous communities, landowners, industry, regulators, and municipal or provincial bodies  

  • Channel and content analysis across print, online, media, meetings, signage, and internal tools  

  • Issues and risk assessment tied to safety, environment, access, cost, and schedule  

  • Internal communications and decision-making processes, including roles and approvals  

That base scope can then be tailored to project type. Major transportation corridors often face high public interest, right-of-way concerns, and media focus, so scope may require deeper social media and media review, plus more community touchpoints. Institutional builds like schools and hospitals tend to focus on users and staff, which can push engagement deeper into internal communications, staff readiness, and change management. Industrial or utility projects often involve tight regulatory oversight and technical content, so scope may include more detailed regulator mapping and plain-language testing. Municipal infrastructure can blend all of the above, with neighbourhood-level detail and council expectations layered in.

Good RFPs set clear parameters. You can specify:

  • Geographic coverage, for example Edmonton Metro, a rural corridor, or a province-wide footprint  

  • Project phases included, such as planning, construction, and commissioning  

  • Language and accessibility needs, including plain language reading levels, translation, or adaptive formats  

  • Expectations for in-person versus virtual engagement with stakeholders and internal teams  


Budgeting Realistically for Your Alberta Communications Audit

Budget is shaped mostly by scope and risk. The key cost drivers usually include:

  • Project complexity and public profile  

  • Number and diversity of stakeholder groups that must be heard  

  • Volume of materials, channels, and data to review  

  • Need for field work, site visits, or in-person interviews  

  • Compressed timelines tied to construction, council, or regulatory dates  

In Edmonton and other Alberta centres, audits can range from streamlined diagnostics to full, multi-site reviews. A lean diagnostic might focus on a few channels and a short list of interviews. A broader audit might add community sessions, detailed data collection, and more time with internal teams.

You can make budgets clearer in your RFP by:

  • Structuring work as a fixed-fee core audit with optional add-ons for extra sessions, surveys, or workshops  

  • Defining what is included, such as expected number of interviews, workshops, and document sets  

  • Stating assumptions, for example that your team will provide access to existing data, help recruit participants, and arrange translation where required  

This kind of clarity reduces scope creep and unplanned change orders later.

RFP Requirements, Timelines, Deliverables and Success Metrics

RFPs for a communications audit in Edmonton or elsewhere in Alberta work best when they are specific but not prescriptive. Strong RFPs cover:

  • Project background and context  

  • Clear objectives for the audit, such as reducing complaints, preparing for a new phase, or aligning internal teams  

  • Defined scope areas, including stakeholder groups, channels, and timeframes  

  • Expected methodologies, like interviews, workshops, document review, surveys, or media analysis  

  • Required experience, including capital projects, Indigenous engagement, and regulatory communications  

  • Evaluation criteria, such as understanding of Alberta context, approach, and team skills  


Timelines should fit real project needs. Plan for:

  • Lead time to select and onboard the consultant  

  • Discovery and data collection, usually a few weeks depending on access  

  • Analysis and synthesis, including internal validation of findings  

  • Draft and final reporting, plus time for governance review or council briefings  


Deliverables should be useful, not just long. High-value outputs often include:

  • A short executive summary for senior leaders and elected officials  

  • Detailed findings and gaps, linked to project risks and outcomes  

  • Stakeholder insights, including themes, expectations, and pain points  

  • Risk and issue analysis linked to communications causes  

  • Practical recommendations, including quick wins and longer-term changes  

  • An implementation roadmap tied to construction and procurement milestones  


To know if the audit worked, you also need success metrics. These can include:

  • Reduced inquiry volume on repeat questions or hot topics  

  • Improved stakeholder satisfaction or engagement feedback  

  • Better media sentiment and fewer surprise headlines  

  • Fewer project delays linked to communication issues  

  • Stronger internal alignment around messages and roles  


Baseline data is key. Before the audit starts, gather what you already have, such as previous engagement results, complaint and inquiry logs, social and media scanning, and internal surveys or staff feedback. After the audit, you can track trends over the life of the project and add periodic pulse checks to see if changes are sticking.

Turning Your Next Audit Into a Strategic Advantage

When owners, municipalities, and project leaders treat a communications audit as a strategic tool, they often see smoother delivery and fewer surprises. It becomes part of project risk management, not a bolt-on. Reviewing your upcoming capital projects and flagging where audits can de-risk public engagement, regulatory approvals, or launch plans is a smart early move.

From our base in Alberta, we see how much expectations have grown around openness, plain language, and meaningful engagement. A well-scoped and well-budgeted audit helps meet those expectations while protecting timelines and budgets. By assembling your background materials, clarifying your objectives, and drafting a clear RFP, you give your project team and your consultant what they need to do work that actually moves the needle.

Strengthen Your Communications With Expert Insight Today

If you are ready to understand what is working and what needs improvement in your outreach, we can help you get clear answers. At reVerb Communications, our communications audit in Edmonton gives you practical recommendations tailored to your goals, audiences, and channels. We work with your team to translate findings into an action plan you can implement right away.


Have questions or want to discuss your needs first?

Previous
Previous

Capital Project Communications Audit Checklist

Next
Next

Alberta Capital Projects: Communications Audit Checklist for Stakeholders